Frame
Define the decision the organization must make
We translate vague discomfort (“systems feel messy”) into a decision statement: what must be chosen, by whom, by when, and with which constraints.
Approach
A methodology built for decisions that must survive real work
This is how OLGA PRITUMANOVA structures business technology engagements — from first signals of friction to a sustainable operating rhythm.
Discover
Collect evidence from the operating system
Interviews, artifact review, workflow walkthroughs, and exception analysis. We look for duplicate entry, invisible handoffs, and missing owners.
Map
Make the current state visible
A shared map of tools, data flows, and responsibilities reduces opinion wars. People stop arguing from memory and start deciding from a common picture.
Design
Compare options with explicit trade-offs
Each option includes impact, cost of delay, implementation load, risk, and ownership requirements. “Do nothing yet” can be a valid option when timing is wrong.
Pilot
Prove the change in a contained slice
Before company-wide rollout, we define a pilot that tests the workflow, not only the software screens.
Embed
Install the operating cadence
Review meetings, KPIs, escalation paths, and a short improvement backlog keep the system from drifting back into shadow spreadsheets.
Artifacts we commonly produce
- Current-state systems and workflow map
- Priority backlog with impact/effort framing
- Decision matrix for platform or process choices
- 90-day action plan with owners
- Pilot definition and rollout checklist
- Operating review agenda and metric definitions